Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:31

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Dow Jones Futures: Israel-Iran Attacks Hit Market; The Next AI Winners After Nvidia, Broadcom? - Investor's Business Daily

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

This Everyday Interest Could Reduce Your Risk of Alzheimer’s - SciTechDaily

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

For what reasons would lawyers hesitate to use a legal AI product?

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

‘Titan: The OceanGate Disaster’ Review: The Horrors of Hubris on Netflix - WSJ

Just in the last 5 years:

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Vandenberg’s Next Mission: SpaceX Rocket Launch on Sunday - Noozhawk

Let’s just make it real clear:

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

Russia can stop this any time.

A new type of X-point radiator that prevents tokamaks from overheating - Phys.org

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Thank you.

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Molestiae quas aut aut quisquam eum aut.

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

What’s next?

What is your first experience having sex with older men?

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

What is the best way to get started using AI to make my own apps?